Triple
T21292728
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yurok people |
E524836
|
entity |
| Predicate | language |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yurok language |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yurok language | Statement: [Yurok people, language, Yurok language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Yurok language Context triple: [Yurok people, language, Yurok language]
-
A.
Yurok language
chosen
The Yurok language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Yurok people of northwestern California.
-
B.
Karuk language
The Karuk language is an indigenous Native American language traditionally spoken by the Karuk people of northwestern California along the Klamath River.
-
C.
Pit River language
Pit River language is a Native American language of the Achumawi people traditionally spoken in northeastern California.
-
D.
Klamath–Modoc language
The Klamath–Modoc language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Klamath and Modoc peoples of southern Oregon and northern California.
-
E.
Siletz Dee-ni language
Siletz Dee-ni language is an Athabaskan Native American language traditionally spoken by the Siletz people of the central Oregon coast and now the focus of revitalization efforts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b517e6748190850d6f6ddf323d69 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e73855e5d08190aed5e285247b4e23 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:04 p.m.