Triple
T21271639
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Syracuse, Utah |
E524273
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedNear |
P294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Layton, Utah |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Layton, Utah | Statement: [Syracuse, Utah, locatedNear, Layton, Utah]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Layton, Utah Context triple: [Syracuse, Utah, locatedNear, Layton, Utah]
-
A.
Layton, Utah
chosen
Layton, Utah is a rapidly growing suburban city along the Wasatch Front, known as a major residential and commercial hub between Salt Lake City and Ogden.
-
B.
Lindon, Utah
Lindon, Utah is a small suburban city in Utah County situated along the Wasatch Front between Orem and Pleasant Grove.
-
C.
Roy, Utah
Roy, Utah is a suburban city in Weber County that forms part of the Ogden–Clearfield metropolitan area along northern Utah’s Wasatch Front.
-
D.
Ogden, Utah
Ogden, Utah is a city in northern Utah known as a historic railroad hub and gateway to nearby ski resorts and outdoor recreation in the Wasatch Mountains.
-
E.
Kaysville, Utah
Kaysville, Utah is a suburban city in Davis County situated along the Wasatch Front between Salt Lake City and Ogden.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b516293c819089458ea2ec85f85e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e736534c348190a8d29e8d724dd40a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:01 p.m.