Triple
T2126849
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | government of American Samoa |
E46445
|
entity |
| Predicate | judiciaryType |
P3734
|
FINISHED |
| Object | territorial judiciary |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: territorial judiciary | Statement: [government of American Samoa, judiciaryType, territorial judiciary]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judiciaryType Context triple: [government of American Samoa, judiciaryType, territorial judiciary]
-
A.
typeOfJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of legal authority or control that one jurisdiction holds in relation to a given legal or administrative context.
-
B.
judicialBody
Indicates that an entity serves as a court or tribunal with authority to adjudicate legal disputes or interpret and apply the law.
-
C.
hasJudiciary
Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
-
D.
judicialRole
Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific official function or position within the judicial system in relation to another entity or legal matter.
-
E.
typeOfJurisdictionDocument
Indicates the specific kind or category of jurisdiction-related document associated with an entity or legal context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1626548190ae59a5028c3baa8e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbb59182081908470f9be97e272c8 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7bd86cc8190938ef06c1ed6d969 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.