Triple

T21250790
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ted Kramer E523737 entity
Predicate conflictWith P4897 FINISHED
Object Joanna Kramer NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Joanna Kramer | Statement: [Ted Kramer, conflictWith, Joanna Kramer]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Joanna Kramer
Context triple: [Ted Kramer, conflictWith, Joanna Kramer]
  • A. Joanna Kramer chosen
    Joanna Kramer is a central character in the film "Kramer vs. Kramer," portrayed as a mother whose decision to leave and later seek custody of her son drives the story’s emotional and legal conflict.
  • B. Joanna Roth
    Joanna Roth is a British actress known for her work in film, television, and theatre, and for being married to Scottish actor John Hannah.
  • C. Lisa Kramer
    Lisa Kramer is a supporting character in the romantic comedy film "Along Came Polly," known as one of the people in protagonist Reuben Feffer’s social and professional circle.
  • D. Joanna Heimbold
    Joanna Heimbold is an American actress known for her work in film and television and for her past marriage to actor Titus Welliver.
  • E. Fern Kraemer
    Fern Kraemer was a party to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Shelley v. Kraemer, which held that courts could not enforce racially restrictive housing covenants.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b5146c108190adc9adb73e90abff completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7359da6e08190a96c471463c2388d completed April 21, 2026, 8:30 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:56 p.m.