Triple

T21190020
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minnesota v. Dickerson E522186 entity
Predicate doctrineRecognized P143222 FINISHED
Object plain feel doctrine NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plain feel doctrine | Statement: [Minnesota v. Dickerson, doctrineRecognized, plain feel doctrine]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: plain feel doctrine
Context triple: [Minnesota v. Dickerson, doctrineRecognized, plain feel doctrine]
  • A. Sanctuary doctrine
    The Sanctuary doctrine is a distinctive Seventh-day Adventist teaching that interprets Christ’s ongoing heavenly ministry and the investigative judgment through the symbolism of the Old Testament sanctuary services.
  • B. Noerr-Pennington doctrine
    The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a U.S. legal principle that shields individuals and entities from antitrust liability when they petition the government, even if their efforts have anticompetitive effects.
  • C. Bivens doctrine
    The Bivens doctrine is a judicially created legal principle that allows individuals to seek damages in federal court against U.S. federal officials for certain constitutional rights violations, despite the general barrier of sovereign immunity.
  • D. rule of reason
    The rule of reason is an antitrust legal doctrine that evaluates whether a business practice unreasonably restrains trade by weighing its pro-competitive benefits against its anti-competitive harms.
  • E. flexible response doctrine
    The flexible response doctrine was a Cold War U.S. military strategy that emphasized a wide range of graduated, conventional and nuclear options to deter or respond to aggression, rather than relying primarily on massive nuclear retaliation.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: plain feel doctrine
Target entity description: The plain feel doctrine is a legal principle allowing police officers during a lawful pat-down to seize contraband detected by touch when its illicit nature is immediately apparent without further manipulation.
  • A. Sanctuary doctrine
    The Sanctuary doctrine is a distinctive Seventh-day Adventist teaching that interprets Christ’s ongoing heavenly ministry and the investigative judgment through the symbolism of the Old Testament sanctuary services.
  • B. Noerr-Pennington doctrine
    The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a U.S. legal principle that shields individuals and entities from antitrust liability when they petition the government, even if their efforts have anticompetitive effects.
  • C. Bivens doctrine
    The Bivens doctrine is a judicially created legal principle that allows individuals to seek damages in federal court against U.S. federal officials for certain constitutional rights violations, despite the general barrier of sovereign immunity.
  • D. rule of reason
    The rule of reason is an antitrust legal doctrine that evaluates whether a business practice unreasonably restrains trade by weighing its pro-competitive benefits against its anti-competitive harms.
  • E. flexible response doctrine
    The flexible response doctrine was a Cold War U.S. military strategy that emphasized a wide range of graduated, conventional and nuclear options to deter or respond to aggression, rather than relying primarily on massive nuclear retaliation.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrineRecognized
Context triple: [Minnesota v. Dickerson, doctrineRecognized, plain feel doctrine]
  • A. doctrineSupported
    Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or provides backing for a particular doctrine or set of principles.
  • B. doctrineDefined
    Indicates that a specific doctrine is formally established, articulated, or specified by an authoritative source or definition.
  • C. doctrineDomain
    Indicates that a doctrine, belief system, or set of teachings is specifically about or applies within a particular domain or field.
  • D. acceptsDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity acknowledges, adopts, or agrees to follow the doctrine put forward by another entity.
  • E. areRecognizedBy
    Indicates that one entity acknowledges, identifies, or accepts another entity as valid, known, or legitimate.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e733372b488190920174955b4b9172 completed April 21, 2026, 8:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5f6027c248190a170a36612bd337e completed April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5f993240c8190847c0b08e65726c8 completed April 20, 2026, 10:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:07 p.m.