Triple

T21168649
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Theologia didactico-polemica E521635 entity
Predicate secondaryAuthority P143138 FINISHED
Object Lutheran confessions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lutheran confessions | Statement: [Theologia didactico-polemica, secondaryAuthority, Lutheran confessions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondaryAuthority
Context triple: [Theologia didactico-polemica, secondaryAuthority, Lutheran confessions]
  • A. secondaryTo
    Indicates that one condition, event, or factor occurs as a consequence of, or is caused by, another primary condition, event, or factor.
  • B. secondaryPosition
    Indicates that an entity holds an additional, non-primary role, location, or status alongside its main one.
  • C. secondaryDomain
    Indicates that one domain functions as a secondary or auxiliary domain in relation to a primary domain.
  • D. secondarySee
    Indicates that one entity is referenced as an additional or alternative point of consultation or viewing in relation to another entity.
  • E. secondaryConstituent
    Indicates that one entity functions as a secondary or subordinate component, element, or member within the structure or composition of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b50e30748190b186824a206d39b9 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e72710c73881908d41aedff8984da9 completed April 21, 2026, 7:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5f6027c248190a170a36612bd337e completed April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5f993240c8190847c0b08e65726c8 completed April 20, 2026, 10:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3 p.m.