Triple
T21167973
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gentry County, Missouri |
E521617
|
entity |
| Predicate | largestCity |
P235
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Albany, Missouri |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Albany, Missouri | Statement: [Gentry County, Missouri, largestCity, Albany, Missouri]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Albany, Missouri Context triple: [Gentry County, Missouri, largestCity, Albany, Missouri]
-
A.
Albany, Missouri
chosen
Albany, Missouri is a small city in northwestern Missouri that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Gentry County.
-
B.
Atlanta, Missouri
Atlanta, Missouri is a small rural city located in Macon County in the north-central region of the U.S. state of Missouri.
-
C.
Alma, Missouri
Alma, Missouri is a small rural city located in Lafayette County in the western part of the U.S. state of Missouri.
-
D.
Madison, Missouri
Madison, Missouri is a small city located in Monroe County in the central part of the U.S. state of Missouri.
-
E.
New London, Missouri
New London, Missouri is a small city in northeastern Missouri that serves as the administrative and governmental center of Ralls County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50e30748190b186824a206d39b9 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e72710c73881908d41aedff8984da9 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3 p.m.