Triple

T211583
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tridentine Mass E4730 entity
Predicate communionMode P9171 FINISHED
Object on the tongue LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: on the tongue | Statement: [Tridentine Mass, communionMode, on the tongue]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: communionMode
Context triple: [Tridentine Mass, communionMode, on the tongue]
  • A. communion
    Indicates a close, often spiritual or emotional sharing or union between entities.
  • B. communionWith
    Indicates a close, often spiritual or deeply intimate sharing or union between entities, characterized by mutual presence, participation, or fellowship.
  • C. hasInstrumentOfCommunion
    Indicates that one entity uses or is associated with a specific instrument, medium, or means through which communion, connection, or shared participation with another entity is established or maintained.
  • D. sacramentalUseOf
    Indicates the use of something as a sacrament or within a sacramental religious rite or practice.
  • E. recognizesSacrament
    Indicates that one entity formally accepts or acknowledges the validity or legitimacy of a particular sacrament associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2575cb1dc8190a01ad332426dc339 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25d35aa288190966b6e15af1525cb completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b4f71b88190866c8262922ae204 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25d3463648190ac716d7475378536 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m.