Triple

T21153566
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BAKITA E521253 entity
Predicate promotesUseIn P143084 FINISHED
Object education system in Tanzania LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: education system in Tanzania | Statement: [BAKITA, promotesUseIn, education system in Tanzania]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: promotesUseIn
Context triple: [BAKITA, promotesUseIn, education system in Tanzania]
  • A. promotes
    Indicates that one entity actively supports, advances, or encourages the growth, adoption, or success of another entity or outcome.
  • B. usesPromotionFrom
    Indicates that one entity applies or benefits from a promotion, discount, or marketing offer provided or originated by another entity.
  • C. promotedIn
    Indicates that an entity was advanced to a higher rank, position, or status during a specified time or event.
  • D. usesPromotion
    Indicates that an entity applies or takes advantage of a specific promotion, discount, or special offer.
  • E. promotedWith
    Indicates that one entity is advertised, marketed, or publicized together with another entity as part of the same promotional effort.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b50d1ea481909c07e63c3ead9316 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7252929748190afd85be40294293f completed April 21, 2026, 7:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5f5f8a5bc819081918c7fa8e4496d completed April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5f993240c8190847c0b08e65726c8 completed April 20, 2026, 10:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:58 p.m.