Triple
T2114586
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IRC |
E42576
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMessageFormat |
P23479
|
FINISHED |
| Object | line-based protocol |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: line-based protocol | Statement: [IRC, hasMessageFormat, line-based protocol]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMessageFormat Context triple: [IRC, hasMessageFormat, line-based protocol]
-
A.
hasMessageSender
Indicates that one entity is the sender or originator of a given message.
-
B.
hasFormatElement
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes, is composed of, or is associated with a specific structural or formatting component of its overall format.
-
C.
hasFinalFormat
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with its completed, finalized version or representation.
-
D.
hasFileFormat
Indicates that one entity (typically a digital file or resource) is encoded, stored, or represented using a specific file format defined by the other entity.
-
E.
hasPanelFormat
Indicates that something is associated with a particular panel layout or format used for its presentation or display.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8871040f08190aac2e2d0ab6b47ad |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbb05b51c81908a78c816f492c45c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7ba08948190a3c236bb53ee4257 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:43 p.m.