Triple
T21142
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Electoral College |
E419
|
entity |
| Predicate | MaineAllocationMethod |
P539
|
FINISHED |
| Object | congressional district method |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: congressional district method | Statement: [Electoral College, MaineAllocationMethod, congressional district method]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: MaineAllocationMethod Context triple: [Electoral College, MaineAllocationMethod, congressional district method]
-
A.
usedByUSStatePortion
Indicates that something (such as a resource, facility, or infrastructure) is utilized or operated by a specific portion or subdivision of a U.S. state.
-
B.
hasCouncilDistrict
Indicates that an entity is located within or represented by a specific council district.
-
C.
FIPSCode
Indicates the standardized Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) code assigned to identify a specific geographic or administrative entity.
-
D.
electionMethod
chosen
Indicates the process or system used to select a candidate or make a decision in an election.
-
E.
hasRedistrictingProcess
Indicates that an entity is subject to, or participates in, a defined process for redrawing electoral or administrative district boundaries.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a240778d288190815c0052ebbbcc91 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a246f7bd30819085f751c41f6f029e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a246526f5881909bc2a46e978bd082 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.