Triple

T21140152
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Regional Federal Courts of Brazil E520907 entity
Predicate hearAppealsFrom P15105 FINISHED
Object Federal Courts of First Instance of Brazil NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Courts of First Instance of Brazil | Statement: [Regional Federal Courts of Brazil, hearAppealsFrom, Federal Courts of First Instance of Brazil]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Courts of First Instance of Brazil
Context triple: [Regional Federal Courts of Brazil, hearAppealsFrom, Federal Courts of First Instance of Brazil]
  • A. Regional Federal Courts of Brazil
    The Regional Federal Courts of Brazil are intermediate appellate courts that review decisions from federal trial courts and handle federal judicial matters within their respective geographic regions.
  • B. State Courts of Justice in Brazil
    The State Courts of Justice in Brazil are the highest courts at the state level, responsible for second-instance appeals and oversight of the judiciary within each Brazilian state.
  • C. Labor Courts of Brazil
    The Labor Courts of Brazil are a specialized branch of the judiciary responsible for resolving disputes and enforcing rights related to labor relations and employment throughout the country.
  • D. Superior Court of Justice of Brazil
    The Superior Court of Justice of Brazil is the country’s highest non-constitutional court, responsible for standardizing the interpretation of federal law across the Brazilian judiciary.
  • E. House of Appeals of Brazil
    The House of Appeals of Brazil was a former high-level judicial body that functioned as a national court of appeal before the establishment of the modern Supreme Federal Court.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Courts of First Instance of Brazil
Target entity description: The Federal Courts of First Instance of Brazil are the country’s primary-level federal judiciary bodies that handle federal civil and criminal cases before any appeals are taken to the regional federal courts.
  • A. Regional Federal Courts of Brazil
    The Regional Federal Courts of Brazil are intermediate appellate courts that review decisions from federal trial courts and handle federal judicial matters within their respective geographic regions.
  • B. State Courts of Justice in Brazil
    The State Courts of Justice in Brazil are the highest courts at the state level, responsible for second-instance appeals and oversight of the judiciary within each Brazilian state.
  • C. Labor Courts of Brazil
    The Labor Courts of Brazil are a specialized branch of the judiciary responsible for resolving disputes and enforcing rights related to labor relations and employment throughout the country.
  • D. Superior Court of Justice of Brazil
    The Superior Court of Justice of Brazil is the country’s highest non-constitutional court, responsible for standardizing the interpretation of federal law across the Brazilian judiciary.
  • E. House of Appeals of Brazil
    The House of Appeals of Brazil was a former high-level judicial body that functioned as a national court of appeal before the establishment of the modern Supreme Federal Court.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hearAppealsFrom
Context triple: [Regional Federal Courts of Brazil, hearAppealsFrom, Federal Courts of First Instance of Brazil]
  • A. hearsAppealsBy chosen
    Indicates that one party has the authority or role to review and decide on appeals submitted by another party.
  • B. hearsAppealTo
    Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers an appeal submitted by another entity.
  • C. hearsAppealsAgainst
    Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers appeals challenging the decisions or actions of another entity.
  • D. hearsAppealsIn
    Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
  • E. appealsFrom
    Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b50b53048190ae34e8abbe3c5ada completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7235e389881908813909e05d1413a completed April 21, 2026, 7:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5f5ed6c8c8190b31092a5d4c3de5d completed April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:57 p.m.