Triple

T2113727
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Simon Tatham E42559 entity
Predicate softwareLicenseUsed P8460 FINISHED
Object MIT-style license LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: MIT-style license | Statement: [Simon Tatham, softwareLicenseUsed, MIT-style license]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: softwareLicenseUsed
Context triple: [Simon Tatham, softwareLicenseUsed, MIT-style license]
  • A. licenseFor
    Indicates that one entity grants or holds formal permission or authorization for another entity to perform an activity, use a resource, or operate under specified conditions.
  • B. requiresLicenseOf
    Indicates that one entity must obtain or hold the license associated with another entity in order to use, access, or perform something.
  • C. licenseModel chosen
    Indicates the licensing scheme or framework that governs how something may be used, distributed, or accessed.
  • D. supportsLicense
    Indicates that one entity is compatible with, enables, or is configured to work under a specified license.
  • E. licenseFamily
    Indicates that one license belongs to, is derived from, or is categorized under a broader family or class of related licenses.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8871040f08190aac2e2d0ab6b47ad completed March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbb05b51c81908a78c816f492c45c completed March 7, 2026, 5:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abb7ba08948190a3c236bb53ee4257 completed March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:43 p.m.