Triple
T21101861
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitutional Court of Romania |
E519923
|
entity |
| Predicate | reappointmentOfJudges |
P106659
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not allowed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not allowed | Statement: [Constitutional Court of Romania, reappointmentOfJudges, not allowed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reappointmentOfJudges Context triple: [Constitutional Court of Romania, reappointmentOfJudges, not allowed]
-
A.
judgesReappointment
chosen
Indicates that a judge is being considered for or undergoing a process of reappointment to their judicial position.
-
B.
appointmentOfJusticesBy
Indicates that one entity has the authority or role of appointing justices to a court or judicial body.
-
C.
judicialAppointmentsRequire
Indicates that making judicial appointments is contingent upon satisfying certain specified conditions or requirements.
-
D.
appointingAuthorityForJudges
Indicates the entity that has the official power or responsibility to appoint judges.
-
E.
justicesConfirmedBy
Indicates that certain justices have been formally approved or confirmed by a specified confirming authority or body.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b508d8dc81909be940dafe36c8f7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e71b5e16cc81908257ccf8c9a59117 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbff56848190a03b350a9305c612 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:53 p.m.