Triple
T21100525
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Silver Reef Casino Resort |
E519889
|
entity |
| Predicate | regulatoryJurisdiction |
P808
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Washington State Gambling Commission |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Washington State Gambling Commission | Statement: [Silver Reef Casino Resort, regulatoryJurisdiction, Washington State Gambling Commission]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Washington State Gambling Commission Context triple: [Silver Reef Casino Resort, regulatoryJurisdiction, Washington State Gambling Commission]
-
A.
Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board
The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board is the state agency responsible for regulating and licensing the production, distribution, and sale of alcohol and cannabis within Washington.
-
B.
Indiana Gaming Commission
The Indiana Gaming Commission is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing laws related to casino gambling and other licensed gaming activities in Indiana.
-
C.
Michigan Gaming Control Board
The Michigan Gaming Control Board is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing and licensing casino gaming and related gambling activities in Michigan.
-
D.
Washington State Department of Licensing
The Washington State Department of Licensing is a state agency responsible for issuing driver licenses, vehicle registrations, and various professional and business licenses in Washington.
-
E.
Washington State Department of Revenue
The Washington State Department of Revenue is the state agency responsible for administering and collecting Washington’s taxes and overseeing related fiscal and revenue policies.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Washington State Gambling Commission Target entity description: The Washington State Gambling Commission is the state agency responsible for regulating and overseeing gambling activities and ensuring compliance with gaming laws in Washington State.
-
A.
Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board
The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board is the state agency responsible for regulating and licensing the production, distribution, and sale of alcohol and cannabis within Washington.
-
B.
Indiana Gaming Commission
The Indiana Gaming Commission is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing laws related to casino gambling and other licensed gaming activities in Indiana.
-
C.
Michigan Gaming Control Board
The Michigan Gaming Control Board is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing and licensing casino gaming and related gambling activities in Michigan.
-
D.
Washington State Department of Licensing
The Washington State Department of Licensing is a state agency responsible for issuing driver licenses, vehicle registrations, and various professional and business licenses in Washington.
-
E.
Washington State Department of Revenue
The Washington State Department of Revenue is the state agency responsible for administering and collecting Washington’s taxes and overseeing related fiscal and revenue policies.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b508d8dc81909be940dafe36c8f7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e71b5cef408190821d345417b77116 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:53 p.m.