Triple
T21099259
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Agordat |
E519849
|
entity |
| Predicate | surroundingLandUse |
P19783
|
FINISHED |
| Object | irrigated agriculture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: irrigated agriculture | Statement: [Agordat, surroundingLandUse, irrigated agriculture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: surroundingLandUse Context triple: [Agordat, surroundingLandUse, irrigated agriculture]
-
A.
hasNearbyLandUse
chosen
Indicates that one land area is located close to another area characterized by a specific type of land use.
-
B.
landUseContext
Indicates the contextual setting or circumstances under which a particular piece of land is used or designated for a specific purpose.
-
C.
otherLandUse
Indicates that the land is used for purposes that do not fall into any of the primary or predefined land-use categories.
-
D.
landUseIncludes
Indicates that a specified land area contains or permits the specified type(s) of land use within its boundaries.
-
E.
secondaryLandUse
Indicates a secondary or additional way in which a piece of land is used, beyond its primary designated use.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b508d8dc81909be940dafe36c8f7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e71b5b51608190aa286d89a9d54e9f |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5dbff56848190a03b350a9305c612 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:52 p.m.