Triple

T2105694
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 883 E37188 entity
Predicate predecessorOf P97 FINISHED
Object RFC 1034 E35279 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1034 | Statement: [RFC 883, predecessorOf, RFC 1034]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1034
Context triple: [RFC 883, predecessorOf, RFC 1034]
  • A. RFC 1034 chosen
    RFC 1034 is an Internet standards document that specifies the concepts and facilities of the Domain Name System (DNS), defining how domain names are structured and resolved on the internet.
  • B. RFC 1035
    RFC 1035 is an Internet standards document that defines the implementation details, message formats, and operational procedures for the Domain Name System (DNS).
  • C. RFC 1094
    RFC 1094 is the original specification document that standardizes the Network File System (NFS) protocol used for remote file access over a network.
  • D. RFC 951
    RFC 951 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) used for automatic IP address assignment and basic network configuration of diskless or minimally configured hosts.
  • E. RFC 1450
    RFC 1450 is an early Internet standards document related to network management that was later superseded by RFC 1901.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8861828948190924aa30c08806b3a completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbaddeb148190b728bce7a7b041fb completed March 7, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ae51926e4481909dd148b5cab3b6ec completed March 9, 2026, 4:50 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:43 p.m.