Triple
T2105671
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 883 |
E37188
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletedBy |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 1034 |
E35279
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1034 | Statement: [RFC 883, obsoletedBy, RFC 1034]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1034 Context triple: [RFC 883, obsoletedBy, RFC 1034]
-
A.
RFC 1034
chosen
RFC 1034 is an Internet standards document that specifies the concepts and facilities of the Domain Name System (DNS), defining how domain names are structured and resolved on the internet.
-
B.
RFC 1035
RFC 1035 is an Internet standards document that defines the implementation details, message formats, and operational procedures for the Domain Name System (DNS).
-
C.
RFC 1094
RFC 1094 is the original specification document that standardizes the Network File System (NFS) protocol used for remote file access over a network.
-
D.
RFC 951
RFC 951 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) used for automatic IP address assignment and basic network configuration of diskless or minimally configured hosts.
-
E.
RFC 1450
RFC 1450 is an early Internet standards document related to network management that was later superseded by RFC 1901.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861828948190924aa30c08806b3a |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbadcd4a081909d60b9b241950335 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae306bee8881908c62306fb1f6aea1 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:43 p.m.