Triple

T21054749
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject First Amendment free press theory (United States) E518679 entity
Predicate relatedToCaseLaw P3137 FINISHED
Object New York Times Co. v. Sullivan — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan | Statement: [First Amendment free press theory (United States), relatedToCaseLaw, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Context triple: [First Amendment free press theory (United States), relatedToCaseLaw, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan]
  • A. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan chosen
    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
  • B. United States v. Washington Post Co.
    United States v. Washington Post Co. is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside New York Times Co. v. United States, upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers against prior restraint by the government.
  • C. New York Times Co. v. United States
    New York Times Co. v. United States is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, sharply limiting the government’s power to impose prior restraint on the media.
  • D. American Communications Ass’n v. Douds
    American Communications Ass’n v. Douds is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld certain anti-Communist provisions of the Taft–Hartley Act against First Amendment challenges.
  • E. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
    Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b5053ac48190921529544959e906 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6fd7edb8481908e4dc7573f7fa98f completed April 21, 2026, 4:30 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:36 p.m.