Triple
T21009
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Order of Merit |
E416
|
entity |
| Predicate | styleGranted |
P1607
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no title of knighthood |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no title of knighthood | Statement: [Order of Merit, styleGranted, no title of knighthood]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleGranted Context triple: [Order of Merit, styleGranted, no title of knighthood]
-
A.
grantedTo
Indicates that a right, permission, or resource has been formally given or assigned by one party to another.
-
B.
awardStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of an award in relation to an entity, such as whether it has been granted, pending, rejected, or completed.
-
C.
authority
Indicates that one entity has the power, right, or official capacity to direct, control, or make decisions for another entity or over a particular domain.
-
D.
allows
Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
-
E.
awardFor
Indicates that something is given or granted as recognition or a prize for a particular achievement, work, or contribution.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a240778d288190815c0052ebbbcc91 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a246f7bd30819085f751c41f6f029e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a246526f5881909bc2a46e978bd082 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a246f4d7908190a947f6da251c6f3b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.