Triple

T20993
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Order of Merit E416 entity
Predicate advisoryProcess P1599 FINISHED
Object informal consultation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: informal consultation | Statement: [Order of Merit, advisoryProcess, informal consultation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: advisoryProcess
Context triple: [Order of Merit, advisoryProcess, informal consultation]
  • A. advises
    Indicates that one entity provides guidance, recommendations, or counsel to another entity.
  • B. editorialProcess
    Indicates the process by which content is reviewed, revised, and approved before publication or release.
  • C. approvedBy
    Indicates that an action, request, or item has received formal authorization or consent from a specified entity.
  • D. hasLegislativeProcess
    Indicates that there exists a specific legislative procedure or set of steps governing how laws or regulations are proposed, debated, and enacted for the related entity.
  • E. selectionProcess
    Indicates the procedure or set of steps by which one or more options are evaluated and chosen from a larger set of candidates.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a240778d288190815c0052ebbbcc91 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a246f7bd30819085f751c41f6f029e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a246526f5881909bc2a46e978bd082 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a246f4d7908190a947f6da251c6f3b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.