Triple

T20990
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Order of Merit E416 entity
Predicate additionalMembersType P121 FINISHED
Object honorary members LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: honorary members | Statement: [Order of Merit, additionalMembersType, honorary members]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: additionalMembersType
Context triple: [Order of Merit, additionalMembersType, honorary members]
  • A. staffIncluded
    Indicates that staff members are included or provided as part of the associated entity, service, or arrangement.
  • B. foundingMember
    Indicates that an entity is one of the original creators or initial participants involved in establishing another entity, such as an organization, group, or project.
  • C. hasMemberType chosen
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with members belonging to a specified type or category.
  • D. hasNotableMember
    Indicates that a group, organization, or collection includes at least one member who is distinguished or noteworthy in some significant way.
  • E. formerMemberOf
    Indicates that an entity once belonged to or was affiliated with a group, organization, or body, but is no longer a member.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a240778d288190815c0052ebbbcc91 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a246f7bd30819085f751c41f6f029e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a246526f5881909bc2a46e978bd082 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.