Triple
T20964110
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Siege of Adrianople (1912–1913) |
E516321
|
entity |
| Predicate | defender |
P696
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ottoman garrison of Adrianople |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ottoman garrison of Adrianople | Statement: [Siege of Adrianople (1912–1913), defender, Ottoman garrison of Adrianople]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ottoman garrison of Adrianople Context triple: [Siege of Adrianople (1912–1913), defender, Ottoman garrison of Adrianople]
-
A.
Byzantine garrison of Adrianople
The Byzantine garrison of Adrianople was the imperial military force stationed in the strategic Thracian city of Adrianople, tasked with defending it against enemy sieges and incursions such as those during the early 9th century.
-
B.
Ottoman garrison of Belgrade
The Ottoman garrison of Belgrade was the fortress city’s defending military force of the Ottoman Empire, tasked with holding this key strategic stronghold on the Danube frontier.
-
C.
Byzantine garrison of Thessalonica
The Byzantine garrison of Thessalonica was the imperial military force stationed in the empire’s second city, tasked with defending it against external threats such as the Norman invasion of 1185.
-
D.
Byzantine garrison of Nicomedia
The Byzantine garrison of Nicomedia was the imperial military force stationed in the strategically important city of Nicomedia, tasked with defending this key stronghold in northwestern Asia Minor.
-
E.
Novo-Bayazet
Novo-Bayazet is a historical town in the South Caucasus region that served as the administrative center of the Novo-Bayazet uezd in the Russian Empire.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ottoman garrison of Adrianople Target entity description: The Ottoman garrison of Adrianople was the imperial military force stationed in the strategic fortress city of Adrianople (Edirne), tasked with defending it during the First Balkan War.
-
A.
Byzantine garrison of Adrianople
The Byzantine garrison of Adrianople was the imperial military force stationed in the strategic Thracian city of Adrianople, tasked with defending it against enemy sieges and incursions such as those during the early 9th century.
-
B.
Ottoman garrison of Belgrade
The Ottoman garrison of Belgrade was the fortress city’s defending military force of the Ottoman Empire, tasked with holding this key strategic stronghold on the Danube frontier.
-
C.
Byzantine garrison of Thessalonica
The Byzantine garrison of Thessalonica was the imperial military force stationed in the empire’s second city, tasked with defending it against external threats such as the Norman invasion of 1185.
-
D.
Byzantine garrison of Nicomedia
The Byzantine garrison of Nicomedia was the imperial military force stationed in the strategically important city of Nicomedia, tasked with defending this key stronghold in northwestern Asia Minor.
-
E.
Novo-Bayazet
Novo-Bayazet is a historical town in the South Caucasus region that served as the administrative center of the Novo-Bayazet uezd in the Russian Empire.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4fde6c48190af1398e7e734629e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6fb71d644819087e00933fcc26217 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 1:32 p.m.