Triple

T209250
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Honeywell DDP-516 E4677 entity
Predicate technologyGeneration P9898 FINISHED
Object second-generation minicomputer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: second-generation minicomputer | Statement: [Honeywell DDP-516, technologyGeneration, second-generation minicomputer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: technologyGeneration
Context triple: [Honeywell DDP-516, technologyGeneration, second-generation minicomputer]
  • A. technologyLevel
    Indicates the degree of technological advancement or sophistication associated with an entity relative to others or to a defined scale.
  • B. technologyType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of technology associated with an entity or relationship.
  • C. technologyTrend
    Indicates a relationship where a technology is characterized as part of a broader pattern of change or direction in technological development over time.
  • D. technologyParadigm
    Indicates a relationship where one entity represents or defines the overarching technological model, framework, or approach within which another entity operates or is categorized.
  • E. technologicalFeature
    Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25737567c81908f9c505300239181 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25e8b9b908190b69a3f0594b95f7e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b4e3c2881908d83e8218aa9f2d9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25e8ade9481908d5570f6a255ee50 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:18 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:51 a.m.