Triple
T209238
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Honeywell DDP-516 |
E4677
|
entity |
| Predicate | powerRequirement |
P100
|
FINISHED |
| Object | suitable for continuous operation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: suitable for continuous operation | Statement: [Honeywell DDP-516, powerRequirement, suitable for continuous operation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: powerRequirement Context triple: [Honeywell DDP-516, powerRequirement, suitable for continuous operation]
-
A.
hasPower
Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
-
B.
definesPoweringMode
Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the operating or powering mode used by another entity.
-
C.
requires
chosen
Indicates that one entity must exist, occur, or be satisfied before another entity can exist, occur, or be carried out.
-
D.
grantedPower
Indicates that one entity has conferred authority, control, or a specific capability to another entity.
-
E.
usesElectricityStandard
Indicates that one entity operates according to, or is compatible with, the electricity supply standard defined or used by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25737567c81908f9c505300239181 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25e8b9b908190b69a3f0594b95f7e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b4e3c2881908d83e8218aa9f2d9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:51 a.m.