Triple
T20883149
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Danny Stevens |
E514202
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipWithAdults |
P142237
|
FINISHED |
| Object | keeps Sigmund secret from adults |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: keeps Sigmund secret from adults | Statement: [Danny Stevens, relationshipWithAdults, keeps Sigmund secret from adults]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithAdults Context triple: [Danny Stevens, relationshipWithAdults, keeps Sigmund secret from adults]
-
A.
relationshipToParents
Indicates the type or nature of a person's familial relationship to their parents.
-
B.
relationshipToYoungerFamily
Indicates a familial relationship where one person is related to another who is younger in age within the family.
-
C.
familyInvolvement
Indicates that there is participation, engagement, or influence of family members in the context of a particular activity, decision, or situation.
-
D.
relationshipToChildren
Indicates the type of familial or social connection an entity has to one or more children.
-
E.
relationshipToEd
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Ed.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f733f081908a401c0b7beb0b9f |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c67b03088190be7cbcde8c59509a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c9a8dc148190b33ff51894e2a8f9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5d53c4d6881909b4d0a716fa5ed4a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:46 p.m.