Triple
T20875701
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | In My Life |
E514012
|
entity |
| Predicate | featuresContemporarySongwriters |
P142208
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [In My Life, featuresContemporarySongwriters, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresContemporarySongwriters Context triple: [In My Life, featuresContemporarySongwriters, true]
-
A.
featuresSongwriter
Indicates that a musical work includes or credits a particular person as its songwriter.
-
B.
sampledSongwriter
Indicates that one entity has used or incorporated a portion of another entity’s songwriting or composition as a sample in a new work.
-
C.
songWritersInUniverse
Indicates that the specified entities are songwriters who exist or operate within a particular fictional or defined universe.
-
D.
notableSongwriterOn
Indicates that one entity is recognized as a notable songwriter contributing to or associated with another entity (such as a musical work or recording).
-
E.
keySongwriter
Indicates that the subject is the primary or main songwriter responsible for creating the song associated with the object.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f675cc8190b4e745225b62eb66 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c674f68c8190a7b43aeea5b9b976 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c9a8dc148190b33ff51894e2a8f9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5d53c4d6881909b4d0a716fa5ed4a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:45 p.m.