Triple
T2085343
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sonia Sotomayor |
E45335
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCaseInvolvement |
P17092
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Shelby County v. Holder (dissenting views on voting rights) |
E15487
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shelby County v. Holder (dissenting views on voting rights) | Statement: [Sonia Sotomayor, notableCaseInvolvement, Shelby County v. Holder (dissenting views on voting rights)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Shelby County v. Holder (dissenting views on voting rights) Context triple: [Sonia Sotomayor, notableCaseInvolvement, Shelby County v. Holder (dissenting views on voting rights)]
-
A.
Shelby County v. Holder
chosen
Shelby County v. Holder is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by striking down the formula used to determine which jurisdictions required federal preclearance for changes to their voting laws.
-
B.
Alabama v. Shelton
Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
-
C.
Baker v. Carr
Baker v. Carr is a landmark 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that established federal courts’ authority to hear legislative redistricting disputes under the Equal Protection Clause, paving the way for the “one person, one vote” principle.
-
D.
DOJ Civil Rights Division Voting Section
The DOJ Civil Rights Division Voting Section is the unit of the U.S. Department of Justice responsible for enforcing federal voting rights laws and protecting against discrimination in the electoral process.
-
E.
Reynolds v. Sims decision
The Reynolds v. Sims decision is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that established the “one person, one vote” principle by requiring state legislative districts to be roughly equal in population under the Equal Protection Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8891869c88190a02643e3bb746f59 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abba53d4488190a7d9eabcb6904e8e |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:40 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae273f8e3481908c45f1686072a95d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 1:49 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m.