Triple
T20848236
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mills Music |
E513283
|
entity |
| Predicate | handledCatalog |
P33578
|
FINISHED |
| Object | popular jazz standards |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: popular jazz standards | Statement: [Mills Music, handledCatalog, popular jazz standards]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: handledCatalog Context triple: [Mills Music, handledCatalog, popular jazz standards]
-
A.
handlesCatalogOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for managing, maintaining, or operating the catalog belonging to another entity.
-
B.
handledWith
Indicates that an entity is managed, processed, or dealt with using a particular method, tool, or means.
-
C.
handledIn
Indicates that an action, request, or process is managed, processed, or resolved within a particular context, location, system, or jurisdiction.
-
D.
handledMatter
Indicates that an entity has dealt with, managed, or taken responsibility for a particular matter, issue, or case.
-
E.
handledLanguage
Indicates that an entity has processed, used, or otherwise dealt with a particular language in some context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4f4898081908209e58edb8f9c45 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c351300c8190a4ec2eb430f0c23d |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5c9a593f481908beb457c29f1ce73 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:43 p.m.