Triple
T2084330
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pathologies of Power |
E45313
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsCaseStudy |
P2398
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Peru and Russia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Peru and Russia | Statement: [Pathologies of Power, containsCaseStudy, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Peru and Russia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsCaseStudy Context triple: [Pathologies of Power, containsCaseStudy, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Peru and Russia]
-
A.
hasCaseStudy
chosen
Indicates that one entity is documented, illustrated, or analyzed by a specific case study associated with it.
-
B.
hasStudyModel
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or defined by, a particular study model used for analysis, simulation, or representation.
-
C.
hasScientificStudy
Indicates that there exists a scientific study that investigates, analyzes, or provides evidence about the referenced entity or relationship.
-
D.
studiesProcess
Indicates that an entity systematically examines, researches, or learns about a particular process.
-
E.
developedInCase
Indicates that something (such as a method, argument, or principle) was formulated, articulated, or established within the context of a particular case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8891869c88190a02643e3bb746f59 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abba524b60819089a11957ce6dbc4b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7b298a48190b4bdf7c9800b058d |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m.