Triple
T2083972
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kashmir conflict |
E45305
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProposedSolution |
P13063
|
FINISHED |
| Object | plebiscite under UN auspices |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plebiscite under UN auspices | Statement: [Kashmir conflict, hasProposedSolution, plebiscite under UN auspices]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProposedSolution Context triple: [Kashmir conflict, hasProposedSolution, plebiscite under UN auspices]
-
A.
hasProposedResolutionType
Indicates the type or category of resolution that has been formally proposed in relation to an issue, dispute, or decision.
-
B.
hasProposedCause
Indicates that one entity is suggested or hypothesized to be the cause or explanation for another entity or event.
-
C.
hasProposedOutcome
chosen
Indicates that an action, decision, or process is associated with a suggested or anticipated result that is being put forward but not yet realized or confirmed.
-
D.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
E.
admitsSolution
Indicates that a problem, system, or situation allows for or possesses at least one valid solution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8891869c88190a02643e3bb746f59 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abba524b60819089a11957ce6dbc4b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7b298a48190b4bdf7c9800b058d |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m.