Triple
T20834709
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mijikenda peoples |
E512928
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalLanguage |
P6149
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Jibana language
The Jibana language is a Bantu language spoken by the Jibana subgroup of the Mijikenda people along Kenya’s coastal region.
|
E1452016
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jibana language | Statement: [Mijikenda peoples, traditionalLanguage, Jibana language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jibana language Context triple: [Mijikenda peoples, traditionalLanguage, Jibana language]
-
A.
Jinibara language
Jinibara language is an Australian Aboriginal language traditionally spoken by the Jinibara people of southeast Queensland.
-
B.
Jebero language
The Jebero language is an indigenous Cahuapanan language traditionally spoken by the Jebero people in the Peruvian Amazon.
-
C.
Jawoyn language
The Jawoyn language is an Australian Aboriginal language traditionally spoken by the Jawoyn people of the Northern Territory’s Arnhem Land region.
-
D.
Kiga language
The Kiga language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Bakiga people of southwestern Uganda.
-
E.
Kitanemuk language
The Kitanemuk language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Kitanemuk people of Southern California.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Jibana language Triple: [Mijikenda peoples, traditionalLanguage, Jibana language]
Generated description
The Jibana language is a Bantu language spoken by the Jibana subgroup of the Mijikenda people along Kenya’s coastal region.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jibana language Target entity description: The Jibana language is a Bantu language spoken by the Jibana subgroup of the Mijikenda people along Kenya’s coastal region.
-
A.
Jinibara language
Jinibara language is an Australian Aboriginal language traditionally spoken by the Jinibara people of southeast Queensland.
-
B.
Jebero language
The Jebero language is an indigenous Cahuapanan language traditionally spoken by the Jebero people in the Peruvian Amazon.
-
C.
Jawoyn language
The Jawoyn language is an Australian Aboriginal language traditionally spoken by the Jawoyn people of the Northern Territory’s Arnhem Land region.
-
D.
Kiga language
The Kiga language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Bakiga people of southwestern Uganda.
-
E.
Kitanemuk language
The Kitanemuk language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Kitanemuk people of Southern California.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4cf62a88190bbf92351e9e57259 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c32622c481908b8d2159bd5bb0ad |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:21 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a090084a1c481909a344ee40d846b10 |
completed | May 16, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a0900fd590c8190b42faa5c5191189a |
completed | May 16, 2026, 11:42 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a0901950c1c8190befa72dc20236b9e |
completed | May 16, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:42 p.m.