Triple
T20803213
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP |
E512090
|
entity |
| Predicate | holding |
P2237
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Supreme Court unanimously reversed Arthur Andersen LLP’s conviction for obstruction of justice. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Supreme Court unanimously reversed Arthur Andersen LLP’s conviction for obstruction of justice. | Statement: [United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP, holding, The Supreme Court unanimously reversed Arthur Andersen LLP’s conviction for obstruction of justice.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Supreme Court unanimously reversed Arthur Andersen LLP’s conviction for obstruction of justice. Context triple: [United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP, holding, The Supreme Court unanimously reversed Arthur Andersen LLP’s conviction for obstruction of justice.]
-
A.
United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP
chosen
United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case overturning the criminal conviction of Enron’s accounting firm for obstruction of justice, significantly shaping standards for prosecuting corporate document destruction.
-
B.
Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction
"Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction" refers to the final legal outcome in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision to overturn Alfonso Lopez Jr.’s criminal conviction, effectively clearing him of the original charges.
-
C.
Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit
Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit is the outcome of the landmark administrative law case Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, in which the U.S. Supreme Court limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by statute or the Constitution.
-
D.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
E.
ACT Supreme Court
The ACT Supreme Court is the highest court in the Australian Capital Territory, handling serious criminal and civil cases as well as appeals from lower courts in the territory.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4cc69f481908e98751e697b9df4 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6c2b2d5688190aaa58a2594d4787c |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:39 p.m.