Triple

T20797062
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Gravelines (1558) E511938 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Count of Egmont NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Count of Egmont | Statement: [Battle of Gravelines (1558), relatedTo, Count of Egmont]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Count of Egmont
Context triple: [Battle of Gravelines (1558), relatedTo, Count of Egmont]
  • A. Count of Egmont chosen
    Count of Egmont is a historic noble title associated with a prominent Dutch noble family whose members played key roles in the political and military affairs of the Low Countries.
  • B. Count of Breda
    The Count of Breda was a medieval noble title associated with the lords who governed the strategically important town and surrounding region of Breda in the Low Countries.
  • C. Lodewijck
    Lodewijck is a Dutch given name, an older or variant spelling of Lodewijk, equivalent to the English name Louis.
  • D. Count of Vechta
    Count of Vechta was a noble title in the Holy Roman Empire associated with the territory around the town of Vechta in present-day Lower Saxony, Germany.
  • E. Wildervank
    Wildervank is a village in the Dutch province of Groningen, known historically for its peat colonies and canal-side settlement pattern.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4cc69f481908e98751e697b9df4 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6c2ad6f0481909e0bab7119f10f9c completed April 21, 2026, 12:19 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:39 p.m.