Triple
T207938
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miryam |
E4648
|
entity |
| Predicate | isTheophoric |
P9869
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no (uncertain or debated) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no (uncertain or debated) | Statement: [Miryam, isTheophoric, no (uncertain or debated)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isTheophoric Context triple: [Miryam, isTheophoric, no (uncertain or debated)]
-
A.
hasPantheonName
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific pantheon and is identified by the given pantheon name.
-
B.
hasNameInGreek
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific representation of its name in the Greek language.
-
C.
isToponymic
Indicates that something is related to or derived from a place name (a toponym).
-
D.
nameOf
Indicates that one entity is the name or designation of another entity.
-
E.
hasEndonym
Indicates that an entity has a name or designation used by native speakers or within its own local language or community.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25737567c81908f9c505300239181 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25e8b9b908190b69a3f0594b95f7e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b4e3c2881908d83e8218aa9f2d9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25e8ade9481908d5570f6a255ee50 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:51 a.m.