Triple

T20768897
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Raasiku Parish E511171 entity
Predicate borderedBy P224 FINISHED
Object Anija Parish NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Anija Parish | Statement: [Raasiku Parish, borderedBy, Anija Parish]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Anija Parish
Context triple: [Raasiku Parish, borderedBy, Anija Parish]
  • A. Anija Parish chosen
    Anija Parish is a rural municipality in northern Estonia known for its forests, rivers, and small settlements within Harju County.
  • B. Saku Parish
    Saku Parish is a rural municipality in northern Estonia known for its proximity to Tallinn and its mix of small-town communities, forests, and agricultural areas.
  • C. Kuusalu Parish
    Kuusalu Parish is a rural municipality in northern Estonia known for its coastal landscapes, forests, and cultural heritage within Harju County.
  • D. Türi Parish
    Türi Parish is a rural municipality in central Estonia known for its small towns, agricultural landscapes, and historic manors.
  • E. Tapa Parish
    Tapa Parish is a rural municipality in northern Estonia known for its central town of Tapa and its role as a local administrative and transport hub within Lääne-Viru County.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4ca01148190ac018e57e0cab46f completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6c24fa1b08190b09ab8fcb87b5c01 completed April 21, 2026, 12:18 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 12:36 p.m.