Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: United States v. Anthony, 24 F. Cas. 829 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1873) | Statement: [United States v. Susan B. Anthony, citation, United States v. Anthony, 24 F. Cas. 829 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1873)]

Target entity: United States v. Anthony, 24 F. Cas. 829 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1873)
Context triple: [United States v. Susan B. Anthony, citation, United States v. Anthony, 24 F. Cas. 829 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1873)]

• A. United States v. Anthony Russo
  United States v. Anthony Russo was a federal criminal case arising from the Pentagon Papers scandal, in which Anthony Russo was prosecuted alongside Daniel Ellsberg for their role in the unauthorized copying and disclosure of classified government documents about the Vietnam War.
• B. United States v. Classic
  United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
• C. Nardone v. United States
  Nardone v. United States is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the exclusionary rule by holding that evidence derived from illegal wiretaps is inadmissible as “fruit of the poisonous tree.”
• D. United States v. Singleton
  United States v. Singleton is one of the 1883 U.S. Supreme Court decisions collectively known as the Civil Rights Cases, which limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections against private discrimination.
• E. Durousseau v. United States
  Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: United States v. Anthony, 24 F. Cas. 829 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1873)
Target entity description: United States v. Anthony, 24 F. Cas. 829 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1873), is the landmark federal criminal case in which suffragist Susan B. Anthony was prosecuted and convicted for illegally voting, highlighting the legal barriers to women’s suffrage in the 19th-century United States.

• A. United States v. Anthony Russo
  United States v. Anthony Russo was a federal criminal case arising from the Pentagon Papers scandal, in which Anthony Russo was prosecuted alongside Daniel Ellsberg for their role in the unauthorized copying and disclosure of classified government documents about the Vietnam War.
• B. United States v. Classic
  United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
• C. Nardone v. United States
  Nardone v. United States is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the exclusionary rule by holding that evidence derived from illegal wiretaps is inadmissible as “fruit of the poisonous tree.”
• D. United States v. Singleton
  United States v. Singleton is one of the 1883 U.S. Supreme Court decisions collectively known as the Civil Rights Cases, which limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections against private discrimination.
• E. Durousseau v. United States
  Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
• F. None of above. chosen