Triple
T207116
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lord |
E4632
|
entity |
| Predicate | confessedAs |
P10002
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jesus is Lord |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jesus is Lord | Statement: [Lord, confessedAs, Jesus is Lord]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confessedAs Context triple: [Lord, confessedAs, Jesus is Lord]
-
A.
confessedTo
Indicates that one entity admitted guilt or revealed the truth about an action, wrongdoing, or secret to another entity.
-
B.
usesConfession
Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a confession (typically an admission of guilt or wrongdoing) as part of its actions or reasoning toward another entity or outcome.
-
C.
convictedBy
Indicates that an authority, typically a court or judge, has formally found an entity guilty of a crime or offense.
-
D.
convictedOf
Indicates that a person or entity has been found guilty of committing a specified offense or crime through a formal legal process.
-
E.
confirmedBy
Indicates that one entity validates, approves, or verifies the truth, accuracy, or occurrence of another entity or event.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25737567c81908f9c505300239181 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25e2aba74819093eddd8d820260c0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b4c7f908190876c1041db52dffc |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25e292fdc8190bfd51d8848f9ed58 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:51 a.m.