Triple

T20667196
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Samuel Freeman Miller E507922 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object Loan Association v. Topeka NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Loan Association v. Topeka | Statement: [Samuel Freeman Miller, notableCase, Loan Association v. Topeka]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Loan Association v. Topeka
Context triple: [Samuel Freeman Miller, notableCase, Loan Association v. Topeka]
  • A. Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
    Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression, marking a major limitation on the absolute scope of the Contract Clause.
  • B. Veazie Bank v. Fenno
    Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
  • C. Federal Housing Administration v. Burr
    Federal Housing Administration v. Burr is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal sovereign immunity by holding that the FHA could be sued in certain circumstances under its "sue and be sued" clause.
  • D. Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
    Patterson v. McLean Credit Union is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted federal employment discrimination protections, prompting Congress to expand and clarify those rights in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • E. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Loan Association v. Topeka
Target entity description: Loan Association v. Topeka is an 1874 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited governmental power to tax for private purposes, helping to define the constitutional doctrine against using public funds for purely private benefit.
  • A. Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
    Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression, marking a major limitation on the absolute scope of the Contract Clause.
  • B. Veazie Bank v. Fenno
    Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
  • C. Federal Housing Administration v. Burr
    Federal Housing Administration v. Burr is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal sovereign immunity by holding that the FHA could be sued in certain circumstances under its "sue and be sued" clause.
  • D. Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
    Patterson v. McLean Credit Union is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted federal employment discrimination protections, prompting Congress to expand and clarify those rights in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • E. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4c059bc81908ea762cd73ea4424 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6b5c39dd48190965d65537592aef6 completed April 20, 2026, 11:24 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:44 a.m.