Triple

T20651981
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sophie Chapman E507516 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWithMarkCorrigan P140926 FINISHED
Object romantic relationship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic relationship | Statement: [Sophie Chapman, relationshipTypeWithMarkCorrigan, romantic relationship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithMarkCorrigan
Context triple: [Sophie Chapman, relationshipTypeWithMarkCorrigan, romantic relationship]
  • A. relationshipToMacCory
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection an entity has to MacCory.
  • B. relationshipToCoraMunro
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Cora Munro.
  • C. relationshipWithNickCurran
    Indicates that an entity has some form of relationship or connection with Nick Curran.
  • D. relationshipTypeWithTristan
    Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship that an entity has with Tristan.
  • E. relationshipToTristan
    Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or familial connection that one entity has with the individual named Tristan.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4bf58c081908e52a4500e03ff83 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6af22d6bc8190b9d6877aba5704eb completed April 20, 2026, 10:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c0315f5081908098707c6455e56e completed April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5c3caef50819093c8159fe8d6435b completed April 20, 2026, 6:12 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:43 a.m.