Triple

T20649172
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lawson Doctrine E507440 entity
Predicate linkedToDebate P50993 FINISHED
Object trade-off between inflation and unemployment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trade-off between inflation and unemployment | Statement: [Lawson Doctrine, linkedToDebate, trade-off between inflation and unemployment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linkedToDebate
Context triple: [Lawson Doctrine, linkedToDebate, trade-off between inflation and unemployment]
  • A. relatedToDebate chosen
    Indicates a relationship in which something is connected or relevant to a debate, discussion, or argumentative exchange.
  • B. debatedWithin
    Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
  • C. partOfDebate
    Indicates that one entity is a component, segment, or participant within a larger debate or argumentative exchange.
  • D. canDebate
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to engage in a debate or argumentative discussion with another entity.
  • E. debatedAs
    Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4bf58c081908e52a4500e03ff83 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6af2076b48190b9c8afb4eac65f46 completed April 20, 2026, 10:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5c0315f5081908098707c6455e56e completed April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:43 a.m.