Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic | Statement: [Griffin v. Breckenridge, subsequentCitationBy, Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic]

Target entity: Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic
Context triple: [Griffin v. Breckenridge, subsequentCitationBy, Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic]

• A. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
  Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
• B. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
  Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
• C. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
  Webster v. Reproductive Health Services is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld several Missouri restrictions on abortion and marked a significant shift toward allowing greater state regulation of abortion prior to viability.
• D. Stenberg v. Carhart
  Stenberg v. Carhart is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Nebraska law banning so-called “partial-birth abortion” as unconstitutional for lacking a health exception for the mother and imposing an undue burden on abortion access.
• E. Planned Parenthood v. Casey
  Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic
Target entity description: Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of federal civil rights law in protecting access to abortion clinics, holding that opposition to abortion does not by itself constitute discriminatory animus against women under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).

• A. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
  Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
• B. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
  Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
• C. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
  Webster v. Reproductive Health Services is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld several Missouri restrictions on abortion and marked a significant shift toward allowing greater state regulation of abortion prior to viability.
• D. Stenberg v. Carhart
  Stenberg v. Carhart is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Nebraska law banning so-called “partial-birth abortion” as unconstitutional for lacking a health exception for the mother and imposing an undue burden on abortion access.
• E. Planned Parenthood v. Casey
  Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
• F. None of above. chosen