Triple
T2063045
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Zealand courts |
E45833
|
entity |
| Predicate | protectsPrinciple |
P9935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rule of law in New Zealand |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rule of law in New Zealand | Statement: [New Zealand courts, protectsPrinciple, rule of law in New Zealand]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: protectsPrinciple Context triple: [New Zealand courts, protectsPrinciple, rule of law in New Zealand]
-
A.
establishesPrinciple
Indicates that an entity formulates, defines, or sets forth a foundational rule, guideline, or standard that others are expected to follow or build upon.
-
B.
usesPrinciple
Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
-
C.
supportsPrinciple
chosen
Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or actively backs a particular principle or doctrine.
-
D.
protects
Indicates taking action to keep someone or something safe from harm, danger, or negative effects.
-
E.
recognizesPrinciple
Indicates that an entity acknowledges the validity, authority, or applicability of a particular principle.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8891b38288190abd572ccad9b6928 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb9d3a92081909416c1d087876e99 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7aee9b48190999620176e3a6ee2 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.