Triple
T2063040
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Zealand courts |
E45833
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSpecialistJurisdiction |
P808
|
FINISHED |
| Object | employment law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: employment law | Statement: [New Zealand courts, hasSpecialistJurisdiction, employment law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSpecialistJurisdiction Context triple: [New Zealand courts, hasSpecialistJurisdiction, employment law]
-
A.
hasJurisdictionOver
chosen
Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
-
B.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
C.
hasMandatoryJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one entity holds legally required authority to hear and decide cases involving another entity, without discretion to decline jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
-
E.
hasJurisdictionStatus
Indicates that an authority or entity holds a particular legal or administrative jurisdictional status over a specified domain, area, or matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8891b38288190abd572ccad9b6928 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb9d3a92081909416c1d087876e99 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7aee9b48190999620176e3a6ee2 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.