Triple

T20627187
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Krein–Milman theorem E506849 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Choquet–Bishop–de Leeuw theorem NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Choquet–Bishop–de Leeuw theorem | Statement: [Krein–Milman theorem, relatedTo, Choquet–Bishop–de Leeuw theorem]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Choquet–Bishop–de Leeuw theorem
Context triple: [Krein–Milman theorem, relatedTo, Choquet–Bishop–de Leeuw theorem]
  • A. Banach–Stone theorem
    The Banach–Stone theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis that characterizes compact Hausdorff spaces via isometric isomorphisms between their spaces of continuous real- or complex-valued functions.
  • B. Dunford–Schwartz theorem
    The Dunford–Schwartz theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis and ergodic theory that provides convergence properties for iterates of certain linear operators on L¹ and L^∞ spaces.
  • C. Banach–Saks theorem
    The Banach–Saks theorem is a result in functional analysis stating that every bounded sequence in a reflexive Banach space has a subsequence whose Cesàro means converge in norm.
  • D. Banach–Mazur compactum
    The Banach–Mazur compactum is a compact topological space whose points represent isometry classes of finite-dimensional normed spaces, serving as a fundamental object in the geometry of Banach spaces.
  • E. Banach–Mazur theorem
    The Banach–Mazur theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis that characterizes separable Banach spaces as isometrically isomorphic to closed subspaces of spaces of continuous functions on compact metric spaces.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Choquet–Bishop–de Leeuw theorem
Target entity description: The Choquet–Bishop–de Leeuw theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis and convexity that represents points in compact convex sets as integrals over their extreme points, generalizing and refining the Krein–Milman theorem.
  • A. Banach–Stone theorem
    The Banach–Stone theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis that characterizes compact Hausdorff spaces via isometric isomorphisms between their spaces of continuous real- or complex-valued functions.
  • B. Dunford–Schwartz theorem
    The Dunford–Schwartz theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis and ergodic theory that provides convergence properties for iterates of certain linear operators on L¹ and L^∞ spaces.
  • C. Banach–Saks theorem
    The Banach–Saks theorem is a result in functional analysis stating that every bounded sequence in a reflexive Banach space has a subsequence whose Cesàro means converge in norm.
  • D. Banach–Mazur compactum
    The Banach–Mazur compactum is a compact topological space whose points represent isometry classes of finite-dimensional normed spaces, serving as a fundamental object in the geometry of Banach spaces.
  • E. Banach–Mazur theorem
    The Banach–Mazur theorem is a fundamental result in functional analysis that characterizes separable Banach spaces as isometrically isomorphic to closed subspaces of spaces of continuous functions on compact metric spaces.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4bd4a0081908d4e97a590a33fb2 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6abe576c081909231dc0d7304b9a9 completed April 20, 2026, 10:42 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:42 a.m.