Triple

T2056467
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Young Goodman Brown E45684 entity
Predicate hasMoralOrMessage P29043 FINISHED
Object questioning the absolute goodness of individuals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: questioning the absolute goodness of individuals | Statement: [Young Goodman Brown, hasMoralOrMessage, questioning the absolute goodness of individuals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMoralOrMessage
Context triple: [Young Goodman Brown, hasMoralOrMessage, questioning the absolute goodness of individuals]
  • A. hasMoralPerspective chosen
    Indicates that an entity holds or applies a particular moral or ethical viewpoint in evaluating actions, situations, or other entities.
  • B. hasMoralArc
    Indicates that something follows a discernible trajectory of moral development, progress, or decline over time.
  • C. moralStatus
    Indicates the ethical standing or degree of moral consideration that one entity has in relation to another.
  • D. hasConservationMessage
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a message conveying information or guidance about conservation.
  • E. hasUpliftingMessage
    Indicates that something conveys a positive, encouraging, or inspiring message or theme.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8891a19508190a12ef1e192308dcb completed March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb9abdb088190991a620e01dc226f completed March 7, 2026, 5:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abb7ad5a7c8190b92575d6053b3fb7 completed March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.