Triple

T2053422
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MLS Cup Playoffs E45619 entity
Predicate hasMatchType P27263 FINISHED
Object single-elimination matches LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single-elimination matches | Statement: [MLS Cup Playoffs, hasMatchType, single-elimination matches]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMatchType
Context triple: [MLS Cup Playoffs, hasMatchType, single-elimination matches]
  • A. matchType
    Indicates the specific category or nature of how two or more entities correspond or align with each other within a given context.
  • B. typicalMatchType chosen
    Indicates the usual or most common type of match or pairing that characterizes how two entities are related or aligned.
  • C. haveType
    Indicates that an entity belongs to or is classified under a specified type or category.
  • D. hasPattern
    Indicates that one entity exhibits, follows, or is characterized by a specific recurring form, structure, or design defined by another entity.
  • E. usesMatchesFrom
    Indicates that one entity relies on or incorporates matches (e.g., pattern matches, rule matches, or result matches) produced by another entity or process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8891a19508190a12ef1e192308dcb completed March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb99196ec819096f491ac7732156a completed March 7, 2026, 5:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abb7abba508190b872f345d3ba51bb completed March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:39 p.m.