Triple
T20531972
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anaconda, Montana |
E504090
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNearbyCity |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Butte, Montana |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Butte, Montana | Statement: [Anaconda, Montana, hasNearbyCity, Butte, Montana]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Butte, Montana Context triple: [Anaconda, Montana, hasNearbyCity, Butte, Montana]
-
A.
Butte, Montana
chosen
Butte, Montana is a historic mining city in southwestern Montana known for its rich copper-mining heritage and well-preserved Old West character.
-
B.
Butte
Butte is a small census-designated community in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough of Alaska, known for its rural character and proximity to Palmer and the Matanuska River.
-
C.
Butte City
Butte City is a small rural community located in Glenn County in the northern part of California.
-
D.
Colstrip, Montana
Colstrip, Montana is a small city in Rosebud County best known as a major coal-mining and coal-fired power generation community in eastern Montana.
-
E.
Libby, Montana
Libby, Montana is a small northwestern Montana town known for its scenic setting near the Kootenai National Forest and its history of logging and mining.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b3a6e08190ae663701f50fab8e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6a06c709881908ef0995426a58759 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:37 a.m.