Triple

T20409266
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Washington, County Durham, England E500546 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object Usworth NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Usworth | Statement: [Washington, County Durham, England, hasPart, Usworth]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Usworth
Context triple: [Washington, County Durham, England, hasPart, Usworth]
  • A. Usworth chosen
    Usworth is a residential locality within Washington in the metropolitan county of Tyne and Wear in North East England.
  • B. Blisworth
    Blisworth is a village in Northamptonshire, England, known for its historic location on the Grand Union Canal near the Blisworth Tunnel.
  • C. Worsthorne
    Worsthorne is a British surname most notably associated with journalist and commentator Peregrine Worsthorne.
  • D. Cullingworth
    Cullingworth is a village in West Yorkshire, England, situated near the town of Bingley and within commuting distance of Bradford.
  • E. Mouldsworth
    Mouldsworth is a village in Cheshire, England, served by a railway station on the Manchester–Chester line.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a935588190b9446a99b37ced44 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e67a3e0c1c8190be39d7f09c839dfa completed April 20, 2026, 7:10 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:29 a.m.