Triple

T20398276
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The French Line E500263 entity
Predicate taglineUsedInMarketing P7688 FINISHED
Object “J.R. in 3D. Need we say more?” LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: “J.R. in 3D. Need we say more?” | Statement: [The French Line, taglineUsedInMarketing, “J.R. in 3D. Need we say more?”]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: taglineUsedInMarketing
Context triple: [The French Line, taglineUsedInMarketing, “J.R. in 3D. Need we say more?”]
  • A. usedAsMarketingTaglineFor
    Indicates that something is employed as a promotional slogan or catchphrase to market a particular product, service, brand, or entity.
  • B. taglineMatch
    Indicates that two entities share the same tagline or that a tagline corresponds to a given entity.
  • C. sloganUsedIn
    Indicates that a particular slogan is employed or featured within a specific context, such as a campaign, advertisement, or organization.
  • D. hasTagline chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific slogan or tagline that represents or promotes it.
  • E. taglineForm
    Indicates that one entity serves as the tagline or slogan associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a81bec8190b69adfdc1336a015 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6798c2b28819092fab93f01218cde completed April 20, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5765d7cb48190adec18d6d1e3d263 completed April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:29 a.m.